Why the US Will Still be the Only Superpower in 2030

Version 2.0 of this article is posted here. 

One of the most popular dinner party conversation topics is the possibility that the United States will be joined or even surpassed as a superpower by another nation, such as China.  China has some very smart people, a vast land area, and over four times the population of the US, so it should catch up easily, right?  Let's assess the what makes a superpower, and what it would take for China to match the US on each pillar of superpowerdom. 

A genuine superpower does not merely have military and political influence, but also must be at the top of the economic, scientific, and cultural pyramids.  Thus, the Soviet Union was only a partial superpower, and the most recent genuine superpower before the United States was the British Empire. 

To match the US by 2030, China would have to :

1)  Have an economy near the size of the US economy.  If the US grows by 3.5% a year for the next 25 years, it will be $30 trillion in 2006 dollars by then.  Note that this is a modest assumption for the US, given the accelerating nature of economic growth, but also note that world GDP only grows about 4% a year, and this might at most be 5% a year by 2030.  China, with an economy of $2.2 trillion in nominal (not PPP) terms, would have to grow at 12% a year for the next 25 years straight to achieve the same size, which is already faster than its current 9-10% rate, if even that can be sustained for so long (no country, let alone a large one, has grown at more than 8% over such a long period).  In other words, the progress that the US economy would make from 1945 to 2030 (85 years) would have to be achieved by China in just the 25 years from 2005 to 2030.  Even then, this is just the total GDP, not per capita GDP, which would still be merely a fourth of America's. 

2)  Create original consumer brands that are household names everywhere in the world (including in America), such as Coca-Cola, Nike, McDonalds, Citigroup, Xerox, Microsoft, or Google.  Europe and Japan have created a few brands in a few select industries, but China currently has none.  Observing how many American brand logos have populated billboards and sporting events in developing nations over just the last 15 years, one might argue that US dominance has even increased by this measure. 

3)  Have a military capable of waging wars anywhere in the globe (even if it does not actually wage any).  Part of the opposition that anti-Americans have to the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq is the envy arising from the US being the only country with the means to invade multiple medium-size countries in other continents and still sustain very few casualties.  No other country currently is even near having the ability to project military power with such force and range.  Mere nuclear weapons are no substitute for this.  The inability of the rest of the world to do anything to halt genocide in Darfur is evidence of how such problems can only get addressed if and when America addresses them.

4)  Have major universities that are household names, that many of the worlds top students aspire to attend.  17 of the world's top 20 universities are in the US.  Until top students in Europe, India, and even the US are filling out an application for a Chinese university alongside those of Harvard, Stanford, MIT, or Cambridge, China is not going to match the US in the knowledge economy.  This also represents the obstacles China has to overcome to successfully conduct impactful scientific research. 

5)  Attract the best and brightest to immigrate into China, where they can expect to live a good life in Chinese society.  The US effectively receives a subsidy of $100 to $200 billion a year, as people educated at the expense of another nation immigrate here and promptly participate in the workforce.  As smart as people within China are, unless they can attract non-Chinese talent that is otherwise going to the US, and even talented Americans, they will not have the same intellectual and psychological cross-pollination, and hence miss out on those economic benefits.  The small matter of people not wanting to move into a country that is not a democracy also has to be resolved. 

6)  Become the nation that produces the new inventions and corporations that are adopted by the mass market into their daily lives.  From the telephone and airplane over a century ago, America has been the engine of almost all technological progress.  Despite the fears of innovation going overseas, the big new technologies and influential applications continue to emerge from companies headquartered in the United States.  Just in the last two years, Google emerged as the next super-lucrative company (before eBay and Yahoo slightly earlier), and the American-dominated 'blogosphere' emerged as a powerful force of information and media. 

7)  Be the leader in entertainment and culture.  China's film industry greatly lags India's, let alone America's.  We hear about piracy of American music and films in China, which tells us exactly what the world order is.  When American teenagers are actively pirating music and movies made in China, only then will the US have been surpassed in this area.  Take a moment to think how distant this scenario is from current reality. 

8)  Be the nation that engineers many of the greatest moments of human accomplishment.  The USSR was ahead of the US in the space race at first, until President Kennedy decided in 1961 to put a man on the moon by 1969.  While this mission initially seemed to be unnecessary and expensive, the optimism and pride brought to anti-Communist people worldwide was so inspirational that it accelerated many other forms of technological progress and brought economic growth to free-market countries.  This eventually led to a global exodus from socialism altogether, as the pessimism necessary for socialism to exist became harder to enforce.  People from many nations still feel pride from humanity having set foot on the Moon, something which America made possible. 

China currently has plans to put a man on the moon by 2024.  While being only the second country to achieve this would certainly be prestigious, it would still be 55 years after the United States achieved the same thing.  That is not quite the trajectory it would take to approach the superpowerdom of the US by 2030.  If China puts a man on Mars before the US, I may change my opinion on this point, but the odds of that happening are not high. 

9)  Be the nation expected to thanklessly use its own resources to solve many of the world's problems.  If the US donates $15 billion in aid to Africa, the first reaction from critics is that the US did not donate enough.  On the other hand, few even consider asking China to donate aid to Africa.  After the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the fashionable question was why the US did not donate even more and sooner, rather than why China did not donate more, despite being geographically much closer.  Ask yourself this - if an asteroid were on a collision course with the Earth, which country's technology would the world depend on to detect it, and then destroy or divert it?  Until China is relied upon to an equal degree, it is not in the same league. 

10)  Adapt to the underappreciated burden of superpowerdom - the huge double standards that a benign superpower must withstand in that role.  America is still condemned for slavery that ended 140 years ago, even by nations that have done far worse things more recently than that.  Is China prepared to apologize for Tianenmen Square, the genocide in Tibet, the 30 million who perished during the Great Leap Forward, and the suppression of news about SARS,every day for the next century?  Is China remotely prepared for being blamed for inaction towards genocide in Darfur while simultaneously being condemned for non-deadly prison abuse in a time of war against opponents who follow no rules of engagement?  The amount of unfairness China would have to withstand to truly achieve political parity with America might be prohibitive given China's history over the last 60 years.  Furthermore, China being held to the superpower standard would simultaneously reduce the burden that the US currently bears alone, allowing the US to operate with less opposition than it experiences today. 

Of the ten points above, Europe and Japan have tried for decades, and have only achieved parity with the US on maybe two of these dimensions at most.  China will surpass Europe and Japan by 2030 by achieving perhaps two or possibly even three out of these ten points, but attaining all ten is something I am willing to confidently bet against.  The dream of anti-Americans who relish the prospect of any nation, even a non-democratic one, surpassing the US is still a very distant one. 

A point that many bring up is that empires have always risen and fallen throughout history.  This is partly true, but note that the Roman Empire lasted for over 1000 years after its peak.  Also note that the British Empire never actually collapsed since Britain is still one of the the top seven countries in the world today, and the English language is the most widely spoken in the world.  Britain was merely surpassed by its descendant, with whom it shares a symbiotic relationship.  The US can expect the same if it is finally surpassed, at some point much later than 2030 and probably not before the Technological Singularity, which would make the debate moot.   

That writing this article is even worthwhile is a tribute to how far China has come and how much it might achieve, but nonetheless, there is no other country that will be a superpower on par with the US by 2030.  This is one of the safest predictions The Futurist can make. 

Comments

[DCC]

the us is not about to become hispanic, and the EU is not about to become muslim. Yes, there are a lot of both ethnicities/cultural blocs in both areas, but we seem to forget that the same could've been said about the Irish and Germans in nineteenth century america. we ignore the powers of assimilation; these muslims are not travelling to europe because they're muslim radicals, theyre travelling because they're looking for economic futures, and/or are running away from religious/ political oppression at home.
Second point: i'm noticing a lot of strawmen arguments, pretending that just because one is not a GOP or tea party member, one is apparently a socialist. I just wanna make one thing clear: the Democrats are not a socialist party, tax cuts do not always work, and that both the majority of GOP and the Dems believe in American liberties; they just disagree on how to maintain this.

[Karan Bhatia]

Superpower? America is rich but Americans are poor. The money projected in statistics belongs to Israel. Americans don't even control their own government, it is run by bodies like AIPAC. When the revolution comes and Israel is destroyed for all the evil it is doing, then all the false statistics related to the wealth of America will also get buried along with the Israelis.

[The Futurist]

Karan,

Why would a Hindu Indian like you be so obsessed with Israel?

America has great wealth. Your first statement is a memorized cliche that is illogical.

[Rufus Fields]

This claim seems a bit overdone: "From the telephone and airplane over a century ago, America has been the engine of almost all technological progress."

Most of the great inventions of the 20th century have come from Germany, which until 1965 had more science Nobel Prizes than any other nation including the US.

And as of 2008, the EU still had the GDP of US and China combined.

[The Futurist]

Rufus,

The EU is not a country. Why did people ever think it is?

The EU is a collection of 27 countries. It does not have a single leader, who commands a pan-EU military, and does not even use a single currency across all 27 countries.

[mike]

Very good article. Times are changing, China is passed its 10% increase days. I remember all the hype in the 80's about Japan surpassing the US, The same thing is happening with China. If America continues on the same path we will continue to be the worlds light of innovation and invention like we have been for the last century. We do need reform though, wasteful spending and a corrupt congress will bring us down. We need to pull out of Afghanistan and focus on problems here at home like a declining infastructure. I have the utmost comfidence in the United States to remain the one and only superpower.

BTW Sean you are an uneducated big mouth dumbass

Go Futurist

[Thanks! And 'remain' fixed. - The Futurist]

[Jack]

US and China-who will win?

US
-A relatively stable uncorrupt government (for the most part).
But polarized domestic politics,. political leaders bicker over everything they can possibly bicker over,corrupted by lobbyists,bureaucracy and inefficiency.

-A highly proficient military that will be matched in effectiveness as the Chinese at their peak.
But military overextension and moral failure

-alarming” deficits(trade and budget), sluggish economic recovery
But business leaders enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else,
infrastructure crumbles, educational system deteriorates and failure to embrace new technologies like high-speed rail

-A slightly happier”upper” and “underclass”.(in comparison to China)
But middle class stagnation and a widening gap in personal income.

-Demographic Stability
-Environmental protection that is fairly good.
-US most powerful weapon: its soft power,best educated and most creative population on earth

China
There are currently two groups of Chinese intellectuals
Some Chinese intellectuals(the glass is half empty gr) do see the following pending problems:
-Corrupt politicised bureaucrats.
-Demographic disaster in the next 10-20 years.
-environmental degradation (Desertification, urbanization, higher dependence on foreign oil)
-Rebellious and resentful underclass that results in social instability.

Other Chinese intellectuals(the glass is half full gr) are looking at the following bright prospects:
-China to be No.(1)in GDP.
-China to become the world No.(1) super power.
-The sheer size of the Chinese economy and its dynamism which is missing in USA and EU.
-Many positive factors such as China graduate more engineers every year than are in the entire US workforce,other achievements in defence,space,R&D,etc
-The “average” Chinese citizen views US as not trustworthy, a threat to China and a threat to world peace, and declining in military and economic power.

[Nick]

With respect. Your article is great.
Being a Chinese,I can clearly see you have strong negative sentiment on China.
There are few points, we can point out that aren't necessary true:
1: piracy in media.
Most people pirating american movies either don't have the money to pay for it. Or the paying is difficult to do so. We don't really have many online paying methods. And for those who watching it, most of them want to learn english. The effects are great in most movies, but we don't really rate them as top movies, because the culture differences. Sometimes These movies just don't make sense to us.
2: top universities and innovations.
For most developing countries, they don't have the ability to produce or innovate new things. They have to copy first like USA did back in history. A country has to reach a point to have the ability to really inovate.(Maybe when all the people are assured to have a decent living.)
3: land on the moon.
No offense, from what I heard, the usa DIDN'T land on the moon in 1969. Just google apollo scam. As you mention in your article, USSR had been ahead in space program in 1960s. But what made you really think that USA could suddenly caught up and even passed USSR in less than 10 years? Thank about the difference between technology 50 years ago and now(ie, computing power). NO A SINGLE COUNTRY has been able to put a man on the moon besides USA. was usa really that advanced back in 1969? (You know, hollywood makes great movies, so it's not hard to fake it).

[Amit]

Very thoughful & genuine article. I am an Indian & I love America even though I am never been there. I know thats not rational, but I think thats what writer is trying to say. The mass influence over the world populus. nevertheless surely USA is gonna be dominating power protecting its interest for many years to come. I agree, & FYI for Indians , try to respect women, stop killing girl foetus & then talk about becoming super power.

[Ronnie]

Why would China even attack the US? That would be downright stupid. Not only would that ruin their economy, but we all know America is too full of pride to go down without sending a few nukes their way. China knows this as well. Besides, Britain would get involved and etc. and it's just another WW3 discussion.

[Hildergarde Hammhocker]

I know very closely two chinese guys in their early 30's wh live here ( Australia _ I am a white anglo (Australian 8th Geneartaion) These chinese guys have both been away in China for about 12 months and only recently came back to Australia. They both say they don't want to go back there. They say it is corrupt and dangerous if you are an individual. One has his wife there ( she has NEVER been out of China ) and a 18th month old baby boy. He says that he will bring them BOTH to Australia as he does not want the boy bought up in China. He says, about Australia, great people, nice weahter, good prospects - democracy and freedom - what more could you want? These are HIS words, not mine.

[jjoel malala ,,Bondo univ,]

Yes,,,while China is intending to be ahead of US in the near future,the still world superpower is also determining to remain at the peak under there stable leadership...congratulation India for your steady determinarion,,,
(Joel sheunda )

[F*ck china]

Fucking hell. This forum is obviously dead now but 15 years later,the Chinese economy is a sh*toon large and thanks to Democrats, we only grow at 2% while china is at 7%